Patents and Innovations of Enterprises
Informacje ogólne
Kod przedmiotu: | 2400-PP3SL200 |
Kod Erasmus / ISCED: |
14.3
|
Nazwa przedmiotu: | Patents and Innovations of Enterprises |
Jednostka: | Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych |
Grupy: | |
Punkty ECTS i inne: |
(brak)
|
Język prowadzenia: | angielski |
Rodzaj przedmiotu: | seminaria licencjackie |
Skrócony opis: |
Diploma seminar to write a thesis on innovations and patents. Searching for answers to questions on relations between patenting and innovativeness of firms and the economy: Does patent system help to create innovations or stops diffusion of innovations? Where is the barrier for patenting software? Case studies of different industries, firms, software etc. |
Pełny opis: |
1. Rationale for Patents and Intellectual Property Rights 2. Pillars of Patent System 3. Innovation Cycle and Patenting 4. Complementary and Open Innovations 5. Measuring Innovations 6. Innovations and Firm Value 7. Patent Citations and Value of Innovation 8. Case Studies (sectors of the economy, firms, software) |
Literatura: |
Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., & Howitt, P. (2005). Competition and innovation_an inverted-U relationship. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(2), 701-28. Arrow, K., 1962, Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention, in The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, pp. 609-626, NBER. Benkler Y., The Wealth of Networks, 2006, Yale University Press oraz opendocument.odt Bessen, J., & Maskin, E. (2009). Sequential innovation, patents, and imitation. The RAND Journal of Economics, 40(4), 611-635. Boldrin, M., & Levine, D. (2002). The case against intellectual property. American Economic Review, 209-212. European Patent Office, EPO, Annual Reports. Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey, Journal of Economic Literature, 28 (December 1990): 1661-1707. Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. RAND Journal of Economics, 16-38. Lemley, M. A., & Shapiro, C. (2005). Probabilistic patents. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 75-98. Machlup F., 1958, An Economic Review of the Patent System, Study of the Subcommittee on Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights of the United States Senate, Washington. Nicholas, T. (2013). Are Patents Creative or Destructive. Harvard Business School Working Paper. Scotchmer, S. (2010). Openness, open source, and the veil of ignorance. The American Economic Review, 165-171. Stiglitz J. E., 2014, Intellectual Property Rights, the Pool of Knowledge, and Innovation, NBER Working Paper No. 20014. Stiglitz J. E., 2014, Leaders and Followers: Perspectives on the Nordic Model and the Economics of Innovation, NBER Working Paper 20493. Tang, J., 2006, Competition and innovation behaviour, Research Policy, 35(1), 68-82. The Global Competitiveness Report 2014-2015. The Global Innovation Index 2015. World Intellectual Property Indicators 2014, WIPO. Papers chosen by students for particular topics. |
Efekty uczenia się: |
Upon the course completion (lecture, discussions) a student: - is able to define a research problem - is able to analyze the literature and choose a method of research analysis - is able to verify the hypothesis and write a thesis. KW01, KW02, KW03, KU01, KU02, KW03, KK01, KK02, KK03 |
Metody i kryteria oceniania: |
Assessment of the outline and method of writing diploma thesis |
Właścicielem praw autorskich jest Uniwersytet Warszawski, Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych.